 |
Untitled Document
Benchmarks
|
System |
3DMark 2001SE |
| 133fsb@1.4ghz + stock graphics |
5898 |
| 133fsb@1.4ghz + overclocked graphics |
6579 |
| 166fsb@1.75ghz + stock graphics |
6405 |
| 166fsb@1.75cpu + overclocked graphics |
7005 |
Here you can see how much difference a mere 25 mhz extra on the GPU and video
ram made, I ran battlefield 1942 as a test game, and it ran perfectly well in
800 by 600 on stock settings, and a little choppy in 1024 by 768. Once I had
overclocked the graphics, it ran perfectly smoothly in 1024 by 768, confirming
that this board is a moderately capable game player.
|
System |
Sisoft Sandra Memory Bandwidth |
| 133fsb 133ram standard timings |
1063mb/s |
| 133fsb 133ram fastest timings |
1245mb/s |
| 133fsb 166ram standard timings |
1053mb/s |
| 133fsb 166ram fastest timings |
1295mb/s |
| 166fsb 166ram standard timings |
1407mb/s |
| 166fsb 166ram fastest timings |
1493mb/s |
As you can see here, running asynchronous memory is of no benefit at all,
and sometimes even worse than a 1:1 ratio. The scores are well below the 2500mb/s
of the nforce 2, and about on par with the KT266s performance. Since this board
is obviously not for the performance junkies, I think it doesn't matter too
much.
SPEC viewperf 7.1 |
|
3dsmax02 |
4.852 |
drv09 |
20.97 |
dx08 |
19.32 |
light06 |
5.259 |
proe02 |
5.075 |
ugs03 |
1.842 |
<< Back | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | Next >>
|
|
