|
Untitled Document
When AMD64 was originally launched, it was launched in two forms, Athlon 64
on the Socket 754 platform and Athlon FX and Opteron on the Socket 940 platform.
The Athlon 64 is essentially the Athlon FXs smaller brother, with less cache
and support for only single channel memory rather than dual. Both chips of course
have 64-Bit extensions and the memory controller integrated into the CPUs die.
With the launch of Socket 939, we see both the Athlon 64 and FX migrate to
the same platform, leaving Socket 754 behind to gather dust. Now we can see
why some motherboard manufacturers were reluctant to produce boards for these
platforms.
On the 17th of August, AMD launch the Sempron range of chips. The low end Semprons
have been created with similar intentions as that of the AMD Duron. They will
be released not only for Socket A, but for Socket 754. The Socket A chips are
rebadged Thoroughbred cores, so won't be the best overclockers, but considering
a 2200+ will be around £15, any overclocking will be quite a bonus.
The best value for money, will be the Semprons designed for Socket 754, which
will be based on the Newcastle core with a reduced cache of 256Kb and no 64-Bit
support. These should overclock very nicely indeed, with speeds of 2.6GHz not
being uncommon. The reduced cache obviously produces less heat and yields should
also be higher.
Since Socket 754 is set to be the next platform for good value, overclockable,
mid-range systems, we thought now is a good time to take a look platforms available
for these chips. To do this, we have decided to this in two parts, this first
article will be looking at performance differences across the available chipset
and will shortly be followed up by a round up of 10 currently available motherboards.
Firstly, let's see how an Athlon 64 chipset differs from the older Athlon XP
architecture. These block diagrams illustrate the differences.

Athlon XP Solution
As you can see, with a 32-Bit system the north bridge acts as a central hub
between all the most important components. This means the north bridge is very
important to the overall system performance.

Athlon 64 Solution
This diagram shows the Athlon 64 architecture. The memory interface is completely
independent of the north bridge and the front side bus is replaced by the HyperTransport
(HT) bus. Because of this, the north bridge plays a less important part in overall
system performance.
<< Back | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | Next >>
|