Random Phrase: Home is where you hang your @...


Read Me First!

This is the Spode's Abode archive. The old articles and forum have been kept here purely for historical purposes and are no longer updated.

Not all portions of this archive may work as expected.


Please visit the new site.



Guide to Memory Performance, Technology and Purchasing
Written by Spode (24/Nov/04)
Page 6 of 8

Untitled Document

Latency

400MHz DDR, C2, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

400MHz DDR, C2.5, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

400MHz DDR, C3, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

Aquamark Overall

60,458

60,272

60,131

Aquamark CPU

9,612

9,530

9,494

3DMark 03

11,101

11,107

11,115

3DMark 01

20,544

20,374

20,359

Doom 3 Low

77.4

76.8

77.3

Doom 3 High

69.1

69.0

69.0

UT2004 Soft

17.05

17.01

17.05

UT2004 High

134.44

133.45

132.87

We were very surprised by these results, with an almost negligible difference in performance between CAS2 and CAS3. At very most there is 2fps difference in UT2004 but the rest are almost identical. Strangely, CAS3 seems to be faster than CAS2.5, we strike this down as an anomaly in testing.

400MHz DDR-II, C3, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

400MHz DDR-II, C4, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

400MHz DDR-II, C5, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

Aquamark Overall

60,001

59,796

59,508

Aquamark CPU

9,454

9,342

9,209

3DMark 03

11,094

11,106

11,080

3DMark 01

20,329

20,130

20,081

Doom 3 Low

76.2

76.3

74.6

Doom 3 High

68.7

68.5

68.3

UT2004 Soft

16.97

16.92

16.85

UT2004 High

133.23

131.9

130.31

Carrying on with the latency testing, we decided to test with DDR-II which goes all the way up to CAS5. Our memory was rated at C4, so we were impressed to find C3 quite stable. The difference between C3,4 and 5 is minimal, following the same pattern as DDR. Less than 2fps sway in both Doom 3 and UT2004 is exhibited. In the grand scheme of things, this is nothing. If we take the two extremes of CAS5 and CAS2, there is at most 4fps difference, which is roughly 3%.

From previous testing we know that the rest of the latencies make very little difference. So, considering CAS Latency should make the biggest difference out of all the latencies, and we are seeing next to no difference at all, we can pretty much conclude that for gaming at least, latency doesn't matter.

Frequency

 

400MHz DDR-II, C4, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

533MHz DDR-II, C4, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

600MHz DDR-II, C4, Dual Channel, 2 x 512MB

Aquamark Overall

59,796

61,191

61,564

Aquamark CPU

9,342

9,999

10,195

3DMark 03

11,106

11,194

11,194

3DMark 01

20,130

21,013

21,043

Doom 3 Low

76.3

79.6

80.6

Doom 3 High

68.5

69.8

70.2

UT2004 Soft

16.92

17.24

17.31

UT2004 High

131.9

137.13

139.23

Specific to the Asus motherboard, comes asynchronous support for a 600MHz memory speed. Here we can see between 4-5% increase in performance going from 400MHz to 600MHz on the DDR-II platform. For an extra 200MHz clock speed, this isn’t a huge amount.


<< Back | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | | 7 | | 8 | Next >>



Copyright Andrew Miller
Please read our disclaimer

Search the site:

Random

Transparent Bay Fan Mod