
Powered by Vanilla 1.1.5a.
Buy iPad online
at PC World.As many of you will know - I've been suffering pretty badly with eye strain the past few years. My GP has been little or no use, and I've tried every piece of advice possible from the internet to very little avail. It's dramatically affected my work ability and I'm frankly fed up with it ![]()
After hearing about my friend Rich Trenholm's surgery going so well, I started wondering if it might be for me. Somehow, I saw an advert for Optical Express, and put my details in for them to get in touch. I must admit, they went a little overboard - I got a *lot* of phone calls and being an 0870 number, when I missed the call, I wasn't exactly motivated to call them back, so I just waited for the next call, which thankfully wasn't too long.
Optical Express offered me a free consultation, and I thought this would be worth my time as they perform such a thorough examination that they might pick up on something that so far hasn't been discovered by my high street opticians.
It turned out that my prescription is wrong. Whether my eyes have changed since I bought the glasses, or whether my prescription was wrong in the first place (which is perhaps why my eye strain didn't disappear when I got the glasses) is anyone's guess - but using objective wave scanning (rather than purely subjective methods) they felt that, where as my right eye has previously been diagnosed as 0.5d short sighted, it is in fact not short sighted at all, but -1.25d astigmatic.
After a number of tests, a lot of talking and a lot of questions and answers, I was torn between getting the corrective surgery, or merely getting another pair of glasses - but with a more accurate prescription.
I didn't grow up wearing glasses, and I hate them almost as much as I hate having squinty, red eyes. I am forced to remove my glasses when doing anything active (Mountain Biking, Gymnastics, Dancing) which always leaves me with a headache.
After the tests were finished, I talked to the sales guy and decided to go ahead with the surgery. Being self-employed, my schedule is more flexible and he managed to get me 10% off by simply taking an appointment that was fairly soon and they hadn't managed to fill yet. At the prices they were talking - 10% is a lot!
I didn't see the point skimping on costs when it came to the procedure, so went for the Wavefront LASIK treatment. Rather than simply having a single prescription uniformly etched into your eye - this takes a reading at multiple points in your eye, meaning that not only will I be free of glasses - but have better vision than glasses will ever give me.
My biggest concern about getting the treatment, was my prescription changing - and frankly, it could happen. However, if it does happen within the first 4 years - they will give me a top-up surgery free of charge.
All in, I ended up paying £1790 - which I was given at 0% interest over 10 monthly payments, just to make things a little easier. That might seem like a lot of money, but if it stops my eye strain - it's money well spent.
I'm having the procedure on December the 10th - so stay tuned for my results, where hopefully I will be typing from a glasseslessness state!

Good luck with the eye surgery Spode. That should cure your visual problems. Let us know how it goes.
I have thought about eye surgery but it just turns me off. ![]()
After some serious thought, discussion and cooling down - I have decided to cancel the surgery. My primary reason was that I wasn't as convinced as they were that my eyes are "stable". It's a wildly different prescription than it was 18 months ago, and who's to say it won't change again?
Instead, I used my deposit money to buy some new glasses on the new prescription and I'll see if these solve the eye strain issues. I'm *hoping* that it is largely a case of my prescription being incorrect in the first place...
If things go well with the new prescription and in another years time they are still the same - I'll reconsider the surgery ![]()
Mmm, that might be wise Spode, my eyes vary from day to day and because this happens I have two pairs of reading glasses. Luckily, my eyes vary from 1.5 to 2.0 dioptres equal in both eyes with no other aberrations. Great! that means I can buy "readers" off the net at around £9 a pair with sprung arms and a huge choice of styles.
But with astigmatism these may not be suitable. Although this condition comes and goes. I used to have it, but sometimes wonder whether it matters that much as I have never noticed any problems using readers and I bet the astigmatism has come and gone a few times.
Interesting isn't it, three eye tests from well known and I guess respected opticians can give you three different prescriptions on the same day ? Talking to the guy that fits the lenses in to the frames etc at my small independent optician, said lenses were only matched to 0.25 dioptres. and only buy in these increments for standard non bifocal lenses.
Aberrations are adjusted out by moving the centre of the lens across the frame. It's all a bit hit and miss I said, yup came the answer. The days of really grinding a lens exactly to some ones needs are long gone, is a bit pointless as eyesight varies from day to day and eyes will adjust to the slight difference. If too far out, eye strain and headaches usually follow.
A bit worrying really, especially as glasses are so expensive when supposedly tailor made. I asked to watch a lens being ground and all I saw was a machine that tracked the inside shape of the frames and cut the lens to suit.
I really didn't want to tell you this sooner and you are an adult and you always think things through. You seemed to be happy having the surgery. It is good and does help a lot of people see much better, even better than with with good glasses, but, I'm glad your not having it done, even just for the cost alone. as with any surgery, there is always a danger and sometimes you must think, "is it worth the risk"?
Over here, there are still some custom shops. Then there are some prescriptions that just can't be made without a custom surfacing lab. I agree though, most shops carry "stock lenses" in 80mm and 70mm diameter blanks that are just cut down to fit the frame and pupilary distance of the customer.
At least you don't have to give up the whole "Fargo from Eureka" look... ![]()
Coyote - I paid extra to get Carl Zeiss lenses. My mum seemed to think the quality was much higher and I figured it was worth the risk ![]()
If I don't get much better luck with these glasses (not arrived yet) - I might try contacts again. Last time they couldn't correct for my astigmatism - but apparently now they can.
CB - the episode where he has a dream he is essentially Zorro, he's not wearing any glasses and boy does he look different!
Carl Zeiss is well respected by us 'tographers, but I've seen Nokia mobile phones with zeiss lenses - so I'm not sure they don't just cash in on their name from time to time. So I'd be very interested to know how good the lenses actually turn out to be!
And yeah, he does look very different without his double glazing - but then, don't we all???
Well, it's been 6 days now with the new glasses and there has been a dramatic improvement. My eyes definitely feel less strained, less tired. The head aches have almost all disappeared and even night time driving is no longer a problem. The computer screen has never looked so clear. In fact, as a whole - I'm feeling less stressed and tired because of this.
The biggest downside, is that now when I take my glasses off - my vision is the worst it's ever been! I can only assume, the past couple of years my brain and eyes have been compensating quite a bit, which they are no longer having to do (in fact - the first 2 days were hard work as my eyes adjusted).
The downside to that, is I'm finding riding quite tricky (not impossible) without my glasses, so I'm going to have to consider some contacts for when I'm going to be riding for more than an hour at a time.
ClubBarf - I'm not sure how much difference the Zeiss lens makes over their own brand, but the quality certainly seems very good and I thought it was worth the risk.
It'll be interesting to see how my eyes feel in a few more months of being unstrained.
I take my glasses off when I go to bed or go swimming - the rest of the day I'm wearing them. If I tried to go anywhere or do anything without them, I'd be getting serious headaches.
As for the lenses, if you're curious enough, get a pair made at glassesdirect.co.uk - you can get them made and delivered for about £20. Then you'll know how much the Zeiss lenses help over standard lenses.
Either way, just wear your glasses all day every day and welcome to my world! ![]()
I've been wearing my glasses all the time for a few years now CB ![]()
Well, erm...
*Something about the glasses working this time*
That's what I meant. That right there. ![]()
There's something strange about the way others see us with, or without glasses. I've met CeeBee on a few occasions and I, if asked before this thread, couldn't answer the question; "Does CeeBee wear glasses" ? If your specs suit you I'm sure others don't notice them.
I assume mine do, as no one notices when I wear them to see small things. I choose the frames I like the look of and that seems to work, well for me any way, maybe I've been lucky ?
I'm so glad we have the ability to correct poor eyesight, because without this I would be so lost, effectively blind to the world of small things, like the text on this monitor and the cooking instructions on my supper!
I tend to keep three pairs around as the annoying things keep walking off, well it seems that way.
A bit off topic, beards have a strange visual effect as well, someone I've known for years shaved his beard off and I, nor anyone else noticed until he pointed it out. Does this mean the beard suits him, or it doesn't ? If it does, and no one notices, does this mean it's pointless him growing it ? Ponder my friends, what strange beings we are sometimes. ![]()
1 to 14 of 14